REVIEW 2 cited by
Coarse-Tuning Models of Code with Reinforcement Learning Feedback
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) pre-trained on code have recently emerged as the dominant approach to program synthesis. However, these models are trained using next-token prediction, which ignores the syntax and semantics of code. We propose RLCF, that further trains a pre-trained LLM via reinforcement learning, using feedback from a grounding function that scores the quality of the code. The grounding function uses (i) compiler-derived feedback on whether the code it generates passes a set of correctness checks; and (ii) feedback from a different LLM that compares the generated code to a reference code. RLCF is model- and language-agnostic. We empirically evaluate it on the MBJP and MathQA tasks for Java. Our experiments show that RLCF raises the odds that an LLM-generated program compiles, is executable, and produces the right output on tests, often allowing LLMs to match the performance of 2x-8x larger LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Tests as Prompt: A Test-Driven-Development Benchmark for LLM Code Generation
The paper builds a 1000-task test-driven development benchmark for LLMs and concludes that instruction following and in-context learning matter more than general coding proficiency.
-
Cyber Shadows: Neutralizing Security Threats with AI and Targeted Policy Measures
No new empirical result; the paper reviews known AI security risks and argues that AI-driven defenses plus targeted regulation are both necessary.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.