Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Probabilistic Concept Bottleneck Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.01574 v1 pith:62JBVVRM submitted 2023-06-02 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CV
keywords conceptuncertaintymodelsambiguitybottleneckclassconceptsexplanations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Interpretable models are designed to make decisions in a human-interpretable manner. Representatively, Concept Bottleneck Models (CBM) follow a two-step process of concept prediction and class prediction based on the predicted concepts. CBM provides explanations with high-level concepts derived from concept predictions; thus, reliable concept predictions are important for trustworthiness. In this study, we address the ambiguity issue that can harm reliability. While the existence of a concept can often be ambiguous in the data, CBM predicts concepts deterministically without considering this ambiguity. To provide a reliable interpretation against this ambiguity, we propose Probabilistic Concept Bottleneck Models (ProbCBM). By leveraging probabilistic concept embeddings, ProbCBM models uncertainty in concept prediction and provides explanations based on the concept and its corresponding uncertainty. This uncertainty enhances the reliability of the explanations. Furthermore, as class uncertainty is derived from concept uncertainty in ProbCBM, we can explain class uncertainty by means of concept uncertainty. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/ejkim47/prob-cbm.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Tool Bottleneck Framework for Clinically-Informed and Interpretable Medical Image Understanding

    cs.CV 2025-12 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 'tool bottleneck' framework—VLM tool selection plus learned spatial fusion—matches or beats black-box classifiers, especially on scarce data.

  2. MVP-CBM:Multi-layer Visual Preference-enhanced Concept Bottleneck Model for Explainable Medical Image Classification

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    By modeling which visual layers best explain each diagnostic concept and sparsely fusing multi-layer concept activations, MVP-CBM improves accuracy and interpretability over prior concept bottleneck models on seven me...

  3. A Concept-based approach to Voice Disorder Detection

    eess.AS 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Concept bottleneck and concept embedding models, trained on clinical concepts extracted from patient notes by a large language model, detect voice pathology from audio almost as accurately as an end-to-end transformer.

  4. ConceptSMILE: Auditing the Trustworthiness of Concept-Based Explainable AI

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A perturbation-and-surrogate audit shows MedSAM and VLM retinal concept explanations have pathway- and concept-specific reliability, not automatic trustworthiness.

Pith tools