Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Conceptual Design Generation Using Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.01779 v1 pith:24W55HJO submitted 2023-05-30 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords solutionsdesigncrowdsourcedllmscreativegenerationlanguagemodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Concept generation is a creative step in the conceptual design phase, where designers often turn to brainstorming, mindmapping, or crowdsourcing design ideas to complement their own knowledge of the domain. Recent advances in natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) have led to the rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) capable of generating seemingly creative outputs from textual prompts. The success of these models has led to their integration and application across a variety of domains, including art, entertainment, and other creative work. In this paper, we leverage LLMs to generate solutions for a set of 12 design problems and compare them to a baseline of crowdsourced solutions. We evaluate the differences between generated and crowdsourced design solutions through multiple perspectives, including human expert evaluations and computational metrics. Expert evaluations indicate that the LLM-generated solutions have higher average feasibility and usefulness while the crowdsourced solutions have more novelty. We experiment with prompt engineering and find that leveraging few-shot learning can lead to the generation of solutions that are more similar to the crowdsourced solutions. These findings provide insight into the quality of design solutions generated with LLMs and begins to evaluate prompt engineering techniques that could be leveraged by practitioners to generate higher-quality design solutions synergistically with LLMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SketchConcept: Sketching-based Concept Recomposition for Product Design using Generative AI

    cs.HC 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SketchConcept combines sketching, voice, and text-to-image AI to let designers decompose a product concept into functional components and edit each component without regenerating the whole image.

  2. Using ChatGPT to refine draft conceptual schemata in supply-driven design of multidimensional cubes

    cs.DB 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Prompt-engineered ChatGPT can partially automate refinement of draft multidimensional schemata, reducing errors from 9 to 4 per case, but human designer oversight remains necessary.

Pith tools