Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Detecting Human Rights Violations on Social Media during Russia-Ukraine War

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.05370 v1 pith:XUI2RSLN submitted 2023-06-06 cs.CY cs.CL

classification cs.CYcs.CL
keywords mediasocialtelegrampostshumaninformationrightsrussia-ukraine
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

The present-day Russia-Ukraine military conflict has exposed the pivotal role of social media in enabling the transparent and unbridled sharing of information directly from the frontlines. In conflict zones where freedom of expression is constrained and information warfare is pervasive, social media has emerged as an indispensable lifeline. Anonymous social media platforms, as publicly available sources for disseminating war-related information, have the potential to serve as effective instruments for monitoring and documenting Human Rights Violations (HRV). Our research focuses on the analysis of data from Telegram, the leading social media platform for reading independent news in post-Soviet regions. We gathered a dataset of posts sampled from 95 public Telegram channels that cover politics and war news, which we have utilized to identify potential occurrences of HRV. Employing a mBERT-based text classifier, we have conducted an analysis to detect any mentions of HRV in the Telegram data. Our final approach yielded an $F_2$ score of 0.71 for HRV detection, representing an improvement of 0.38 over the multilingual BERT base model. We release two datasets that contains Telegram posts: (1) large corpus with over 2.3 millions posts and (2) annotated at the sentence-level dataset to indicate HRVs. The Telegram posts are in the context of the Russia-Ukraine war. We posit that our findings hold significant implications for NGOs, governments, and researchers by providing a means to detect and document possible human rights violations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Comparing LLM Text Annotation Skills: A Study on Human Rights Violations in Social Media Data

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    GPT-4 achieved the highest F1 and accuracy among five LLMs for zero-shot and few-shot annotation of human rights violation references in Russian and Ukrainian Telegram posts.

  2. Do Large Language Models Know Conflict? Investigating Parametric vs. Non-Parametric Knowledge of LLMs for Conflict Forecasting

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    LLMs show limited parametric knowledge for conflict forecasting; adding retrieved context from GDELT and ACLED improves GPT-4's predictions modestly but does not help LLaMA-2.

  3. Towards Automated Situation Awareness: A RAG-Based Framework for Peacebuilding Reports

    cs.CY 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A dynamic RAG pipeline generates situation awareness reports for peacebuilding from GDELT, ACLED, ReliefWeb, and World Bank data, evaluated by NLP metrics, UNDP experts, and LLM judges.

Pith tools