REVIEW 1 cited by
Protect Your Prompts: Protocols for IP Protection in LLM Applications
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Protect Your Prompts: Protocols for IP Protection in LLM Applications
read the original abstract
With the rapid adoption of AI in the form of large language models (LLMs), the potential value of carefully engineered prompts has become significant. However, to realize this potential, prompts should be tradable on an open market. Since prompts are, at present, generally economically non-excludable, by virtue of their nature as text, no general competitive market has yet been established. This note discusses two protocols intended to provide protection of prompts, elevating their status as intellectual property, thus confirming the intellectual property rights of prompt engineers, and potentially supporting the flourishing of an open market for LLM prompts.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
ABLE: Representing and Mapping LLMs via Attribution-Based Large-model Embedding
ABLE constructs model embeddings from gradient-based input attributions, enabling training-free LLM comparison across 239 models with theoretical stability guarantees.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.