REVIEW 1 cited by
Improving the Lower Bound for the Union-closed Sets Conjecture via Conditionally IID Coupling
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Recently, Gilmer proved the first constant lower bound for the union-closed sets conjecture via an information-theoretic argument. The heart of the argument is an entropic inequality involving the OR function of two i.i.d.\ binary vectors, and the best constant obtainable through the i.i.d.\ coupling is $\frac{3-\sqrt{5}}{2}\approx0.38197$. Sawin demonstrated that the bound can be strictly improved by considering a convex combination of the i.i.d.\ coupling and the max-entropy coupling, and the best constant obtainable through this approach is around 0.38234, as evaluated by Yu and Cambie. In this work we show analytically that the bound can be further strictly improved by considering another class of coupling under which the two binary sequences are i.i.d.\ conditioned on an auxiliary random variable. We also provide a new class of bounds in terms of finite-dimensional optimization. For a basic instance from this class, analysis assisted with numerically solved 9-dimensional optimization suggests that the optimizer assumes a certain structure. Under numerically verified hypotheses, the lower bound for the union-closed sets conjecture can be improved to approximately 0.38271, a number that can be defined as the solution to an analytic equation.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A lemma on a finite union-closed family of finite sets and its applications
A lemma bounding element frequencies under deletion implies the equivalence of Frankl's conjecture and Nagel's conjecture, and strengthens a bound of Nagel for sets of size at least two.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.