REVIEW 4 cited by
Explainable Multimodal Emotion Recognition
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Multimodal emotion recognition is an important research topic in artificial intelligence, whose main goal is to integrate multimodal clues to identify human emotional states. Current works generally assume accurate labels for benchmark datasets and focus on developing more effective architectures. However, emotion annotation relies on subjective judgment. To obtain more reliable labels, existing datasets usually restrict the label space to some basic categories, then hire plenty of annotators and use majority voting to select the most likely label. However, this process may result in some correct but non-candidate or non-majority labels being ignored. To ensure reliability without ignoring subtle emotions, we propose a new task called ``Explainable Multimodal Emotion Recognition (EMER)''. Unlike traditional emotion recognition, EMER takes a step further by providing explanations for these predictions. Through this task, we can extract relatively reliable labels since each label has a certain basis. Meanwhile, we borrow large language models (LLMs) to disambiguate unimodal clues and generate more complete multimodal explanations. From them, we can extract richer emotions in an open-vocabulary manner. This paper presents our initial attempt at this task, including introducing a new dataset, establishing baselines, and defining evaluation metrics. In addition, EMER can serve as a benchmark task to evaluate the audio-video-text understanding performance of multimodal LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
VKnowU: Evaluating Visual Knowledge Understanding in Multimodal LLMs
A 1,680-question video benchmark shows leading multimodal models lag humans by ~15 points on visual knowledge, and a See-Think-Answer RL-trained model narrows the gap.
-
HumanOmniV2: From Understanding to Omni-Modal Reasoning with Context
Requiring omni-modal models to summarize context before reasoning, with LLM-judged context and logical rewards, improves human-intent reasoning benchmarks.
-
OmniOPSD: Rationale-Privileged On-Policy Self-Distillation for Affective Computing
Rationale-privileged on-policy self-distillation reaches 84.19 mean on MER-UniBench by scoring student rollouts with a local teacher that alone sees frontier-generated multimodal evidence.
-
EMO-R3: Reflective Reinforcement Learning for Emotional Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models
EMO-R3, which combines a three-step emotional reasoning prompt with a reward for the model agreeing with its own image–emotion judgments, raises visual emotion-recognition accuracy by about one point over plain GRPO.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.