Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

CBBQ: A Chinese Bias Benchmark Dataset Curated with Human-AI Collaboration for Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.16244 v1 pith:H7HFM4MG submitted 2023-06-28 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords datasetmodelsbiaschineselanguagecbbqlargeavailable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Holistically measuring societal biases of large language models is crucial for detecting and reducing ethical risks in highly capable AI models. In this work, we present a Chinese Bias Benchmark dataset that consists of over 100K questions jointly constructed by human experts and generative language models, covering stereotypes and societal biases in 14 social dimensions related to Chinese culture and values. The curation process contains 4 essential steps: bias identification via extensive literature review, ambiguous context generation, AI-assisted disambiguous context generation, snd manual review \& recomposition. The testing instances in the dataset are automatically derived from 3K+ high-quality templates manually authored with stringent quality control. The dataset exhibits wide coverage and high diversity. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the dataset in detecting model bias, with all 10 publicly available Chinese large language models exhibiting strong bias in certain categories. Additionally, we observe from our experiments that fine-tuned models could, to a certain extent, heed instructions and avoid generating outputs that are morally harmful in some types, in the way of "moral self-correction". Our dataset and results are publicly available at \href{https://github.com/YFHuangxxxx/CBBQ}{https://github.com/YFHuangxxxx/CBBQ}, offering debiasing research opportunities to a widened community.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Camellia: Benchmarking Cultural Biases in LLMs for Asian Languages

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across nine Asian languages, multilingual LLMs favor Western cultural entities in 30-40% of culturally grounded contexts, with model-specific sentiment biases and extraction accuracy gaps.

  2. McBE: A Multi-task Chinese Bias Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new Chinese bias benchmark with 4,077 instances and five tasks indicates larger language models are less biased than smaller ones when bias is measured through understanding tasks.

  3. The Scales of Justitia: A Comprehensive Survey on Safety Evaluation of LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A structured survey of LLM safety evaluation that proposes a why/what/where/how taxonomy and catalogs metrics, datasets, benchmarks, evaluators, and frameworks.

Pith tools