Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Information-Computation Tradeoffs for Learning Margin Halfspaces with Random Classification Noise

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.16352 v1 pith:CKFURUSX submitted 2023-06-28 cs.LG cs.DSmath.STstat.MLstat.TH

Information-Computation Tradeoffs for Learning Margin Halfspaces with Random Classification Noise

classification cs.LG cs.DSmath.STstat.MLstat.TH
keywords complexitysampleefficientepsilongammaalgorithmsproblemwidetilde
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

We study the problem of PAC learning $\gamma$-margin halfspaces with Random Classification Noise. We establish an information-computation tradeoff suggesting an inherent gap between the sample complexity of the problem and the sample complexity of computationally efficient algorithms. Concretely, the sample complexity of the problem is $\widetilde{\Theta}(1/(\gamma^2 \epsilon))$. We start by giving a simple efficient algorithm with sample complexity $\widetilde{O}(1/(\gamma^2 \epsilon^2))$. Our main result is a lower bound for Statistical Query (SQ) algorithms and low-degree polynomial tests suggesting that the quadratic dependence on $1/\epsilon$ in the sample complexity is inherent for computationally efficient algorithms. Specifically, our results imply a lower bound of $\widetilde{\Omega}(1/(\gamma^{1/2} \epsilon^2))$ on the sample complexity of any efficient SQ learner or low-degree test.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.