Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Near-Optimal Bounds for Learning Gaussian Halfspaces with Random Classification Noise

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.08438 v1 pith:PEWB52WW submitted 2023-07-13 cs.LG cs.DSmath.STstat.MLstat.TH

Near-Optimal Bounds for Learning Gaussian Halfspaces with Random Classification Noise

classification cs.LG cs.DSmath.STstat.MLstat.TH
keywords epsilonlearningproblemboundcomplexityefficientlowersample
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We study the problem of learning general (i.e., not necessarily homogeneous) halfspaces with Random Classification Noise under the Gaussian distribution. We establish nearly-matching algorithmic and Statistical Query (SQ) lower bound results revealing a surprising information-computation gap for this basic problem. Specifically, the sample complexity of this learning problem is $\widetilde{\Theta}(d/\epsilon)$, where $d$ is the dimension and $\epsilon$ is the excess error. Our positive result is a computationally efficient learning algorithm with sample complexity $\tilde{O}(d/\epsilon + d/(\max\{p, \epsilon\})^2)$, where $p$ quantifies the bias of the target halfspace. On the lower bound side, we show that any efficient SQ algorithm (or low-degree test) for the problem requires sample complexity at least $\Omega(d^{1/2}/(\max\{p, \epsilon\})^2)$. Our lower bound suggests that this quadratic dependence on $1/\epsilon$ is inherent for efficient algorithms.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.