Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

PubMed and Beyond: Biomedical Literature Search in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.09683 v3 pith:775GWK4D submitted 2023-07-18 cs.IR cs.AIcs.DL

classification cs.IRcs.AIcs.DL
keywords literaturesearchinformationbiomedicaltoolsneedsrecentresearch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Biomedical research yields a wealth of information, much of which is only accessible through the literature. Consequently, literature search is an essential tool for building on prior knowledge in clinical and biomedical research. Although recent improvements in artificial intelligence have expanded functionality beyond keyword-based search, these advances may be unfamiliar to clinicians and researchers. In response, we present a survey of literature search tools tailored to both general and specific information needs in biomedicine, with the objective of helping readers efficiently fulfill their information needs. We first examine the widely used PubMed search engine, discussing recent improvements and continued challenges. We then describe literature search tools catering to five specific information needs: 1. Identifying high-quality clinical research for evidence-based medicine. 2. Retrieving gene-related information for precision medicine and genomics. 3. Searching by meaning, including natural language questions. 4. Locating related articles with literature recommendation. 5. Mining literature to discover associations between concepts such as diseases and genetic variants. Additionally, we cover practical considerations and best practices for choosing and using these tools. Finally, we provide a perspective on the future of literature search engines, considering recent breakthroughs in large language models such as ChatGPT. In summary, our survey provides a comprehensive view of biomedical literature search functionalities with 36 publicly available tools.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A GenAI System for Improved FAIR Independent Biological Database Integration

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    FAIRBridge is a GenAI system that discovers biological databases from literature and uses GPT-4o plus web wrappers to retrieve and integrate their data through natural language queries.

  2. Knowledge Augmented Complex Problem Solving with Large Language Models: A Survey

    cs.LG 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes LLM-based complex problem solving into three components, multi-step reasoning, domain knowledge, and result verification, and reviews methods and challenges across four application domains.

Pith tools