Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Mitigating Bias in Conversations: A Hate Speech Classifier and Debiaser with Prompts

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.10213 v1 pith:SPVTEWGM submitted 2023-07-14 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords hatespeechapproachbiasesclassifierconversationspromptsalternatives
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Discriminatory language and biases are often present in hate speech during conversations, which usually lead to negative impacts on targeted groups such as those based on race, gender, and religion. To tackle this issue, we propose an approach that involves a two-step process: first, detecting hate speech using a classifier, and then utilizing a debiasing component that generates less biased or unbiased alternatives through prompts. We evaluated our approach on a benchmark dataset and observed reduction in negativity due to hate speech comments. The proposed method contributes to the ongoing efforts to reduce biases in online discourse and promote a more inclusive and fair environment for communication.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Discrimination by LLMs: Cross-lingual Bias Assessment and Mitigation in Decision-Making and Summarisation

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs show significant demographic bias in decision-making, favoring women, younger ages, and certain minority backgrounds; summarization shows little bias, and bias patterns largely transfer from English to Dutch.

  2. AI Agent Behavioral Science

    q-bio.NC 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    AI agents should be studied as behavioral entities shaped by context and interaction, not only as trained models.

Pith tools