Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Parametric Study of the SASI Comparing General Relativistic and Nonrelativistic Treatments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.10904 v2 pith:DJIX4VIJ submitted 2023-07-20 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SRgr-qcphysics.flu-dyn

classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SRgr-qcphysics.flu-dyn
keywords sasicasesccsnfindgeneralgravityhighest-compactnesshydrodynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present numerical results from a parameter study of the standing accretion shock instability (SASI), investigating the impact of general relativity (GR) on the dynamics. Using GR hydrodynamics with GR gravity, and nonrelativistic (NR) hydrodynamics with Newtonian gravity, in an idealized model setting, we vary the initial radius of the shock and, by varying its mass and radius in concert, the proto-neutron star (PNS) compactness. We investigate four compactnesses expected in a post-bounce core-collapse supernova (CCSN). We find that GR leads to a longer SASI oscillation period, with ratios between the GR and NR cases as large as 1.29 for the highest-compactness suite. We also find that GR leads to a slower SASI growth rate, with ratios between the GR and NR cases as low as 0.47 for the highest-compactness suite. We discuss implications of our results for CCSN simulations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools