Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Simulation-based Inference for Cardiovascular Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.13918 v3 pith:QYVOIB5R submitted 2023-07-26 stat.ML cs.LGq-bio.QM

classification stat.MLcs.LGq-bio.QM
keywords cardiovascularin-silicoinferenceparameterstextituncertaintyanalysisbiomarkers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Over the past decades, hemodynamics simulators have steadily evolved and have become tools of choice for studying cardiovascular systems in-silico. While such tools are routinely used to simulate whole-body hemodynamics from physiological parameters, solving the corresponding inverse problem of mapping waveforms back to plausible physiological parameters remains both promising and challenging. Motivated by advances in simulation-based inference (SBI), we cast this inverse problem as statistical inference. In contrast to alternative approaches, SBI provides \textit{posterior distributions} for the parameters of interest, providing a \textit{multi-dimensional} representation of uncertainty for \textit{individual} measurements. We showcase this ability by performing an in-silico uncertainty analysis of five biomarkers of clinical interest comparing several measurement modalities. Beyond the corroboration of known facts, such as the feasibility of estimating heart rate, our study highlights the potential of estimating new biomarkers from standard-of-care measurements. SBI reveals practically relevant findings that cannot be captured by standard sensitivity analyses, such as the existence of sub-populations for which parameter estimation exhibits distinct uncertainty regimes. Finally, we study the gap between in-vivo and in-silico with the MIMIC-III waveform database and critically discuss how cardiovascular simulations can inform real-world data analysis.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Real-Time Digital Twin for Type 1 Diabetes using Simulation-Based Inference

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Neural posterior estimation infers 17 diabetes-model parameters and initial conditions from CGM data in 3.4 seconds, with better out-of-sample glucose forecasts than MCMC and MAP baselines in simulated tests.

  2. Accelerated Patient-Specific Calibration via Differentiable Hemodynamics Simulations

    physics.med-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A differentiable 1D hemodynamics solver in JAX enables gradient-based inference of Windkessel parameters from pressure waveforms.

Pith tools