Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

AI exposure predicts unemployment risk

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.02624 v1 pith:YNQSM3M3 submitted 2023-08-04 cs.CY econ.GNq-fin.EC

classification cs.CYecon.GNq-fin.EC
keywords unemploymentexposuremodelsdatariskoccupationspredictiverates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Is artificial intelligence (AI) disrupting jobs and creating unemployment? Despite many attempts to quantify occupations' exposure to AI, inconsistent validation obfuscates the relative benefits of each approach. A lack of disaggregated labor outcome data, including unemployment data, further exacerbates the issue. Here, we assess which models of AI exposure predict job separations and unemployment risk using new occupation-level unemployment data by occupation from each US state's unemployment insurance office spanning 2010 through 2020. Although these AI exposure scores have been used by governments and industry, we find that individual AI exposure models are not predictive of unemployment rates, unemployment risk, or job separation rates. However, an ensemble of those models exhibits substantial predictive power suggesting that competing models may capture different aspects of AI exposure that collectively account for AI's variable impact across occupations, regions, and time. Our results also call for dynamic, context-aware, and validated methods for assessing AI exposure. Interactive visualizations for this study are available at https://sites.pitt.edu/~mrfrank/uiRiskDemo/.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Potential Impact of Disruptive AI Innovations on U.S. Occupations

    cs.CY 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AI patents that are 'disruptive' are associated with mental, unpredictable, solo tasks, while 'consolidating' patents are associated with physical, routine, solo tasks.

Pith tools