Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

LLMeBench: A Flexible Framework for Accelerating LLMs Benchmarking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.04945 v2 pith:7SOXCEXD submitted 2023-08-09 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords frameworkllmebenchtasksavailabledatasetsllmsbeendataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The recent development and success of Large Language Models (LLMs) necessitate an evaluation of their performance across diverse NLP tasks in different languages. Although several frameworks have been developed and made publicly available, their customization capabilities for specific tasks and datasets are often complex for different users. In this study, we introduce the LLMeBench framework, which can be seamlessly customized to evaluate LLMs for any NLP task, regardless of language. The framework features generic dataset loaders, several model providers, and pre-implements most standard evaluation metrics. It supports in-context learning with zero- and few-shot settings. A specific dataset and task can be evaluated for a given LLM in less than 20 lines of code while allowing full flexibility to extend the framework for custom datasets, models, or tasks. The framework has been tested on 31 unique NLP tasks using 53 publicly available datasets within 90 experimental setups, involving approximately 296K data points. We open-sourced LLMeBench for the community (https://github.com/qcri/LLMeBench/) and a video demonstrating the framework is available online. (https://youtu.be/9cC2m_abk3A)

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating Robustness of LLMs on Crisis-Related Microblogs across Events, Information Types, and Linguistic Features

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systematic evaluation shows GPT-4o and GPT-4 outperform open-source LLMs on crisis tweet classification, with flood events and urgent-need messages as consistent failure points.

Pith tools