Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Budget-constrained cut problems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.07063 v1 pith:EMHNWGTF submitted 2023-08-14 math.CO math.OC

classification math.COmath.OC
keywords problemscostexactgraphmin-cutproblemalgorithmalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The minimum and maximum cuts of an undirected edge-weighted graph are classic problems in graph theory. While the Min-Cut Problem can be solved in P, the Max-Cut Problem is NP-Complete. Exact and heuristic methods have been developed for solving them. For both problems, we introduce a natural extension in which cutting an edge induces a cost. Our goal is to find a cut that minimizes the sum of the cut weights but, at the same time, restricts its total cut cost to a given budget. We prove that both restricted problems are NPComplete and we also study some of its properties. Finally, we develop exact algorithms to solve both as well as a non-exact algorithm for the min-cut case based on a Lagreangean relaxation that generally provides optimal solutions. Their performance is reported by an extensive computational experience.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Progressive Binarization - Pauli Correlation Encoding: a Continuation Method for Constrained Optimization

    quant-ph 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An adaptive schedule that gradually increases the PCE binarization parameter solves budget-constrained MinCut up to 300 variables with 9-qubit circuits, reaching 88–100% constraint satisfaction.

Pith tools