Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Context-Aware Planning and Environment-Aware Memory for Instruction Following Embodied Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.07241 v4 pith:WAOANOXW submitted 2023-08-14 cs.RO cs.AI

classification cs.ROcs.AI
keywords actionsobjectsagentscapeamcontext-awareembodiedenvironment-awarefollowing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Accomplishing household tasks requires to plan step-by-step actions considering the consequences of previous actions. However, the state-of-the-art embodied agents often make mistakes in navigating the environment and interacting with proper objects due to imperfect learning by imitating experts or algorithmic planners without such knowledge. To improve both visual navigation and object interaction, we propose to consider the consequence of taken actions by CAPEAM (Context-Aware Planning and Environment-Aware Memory) that incorporates semantic context (e.g., appropriate objects to interact with) in a sequence of actions, and the changed spatial arrangement and states of interacted objects (e.g., location that the object has been moved to) in inferring the subsequent actions. We empirically show that the agent with the proposed CAPEAM achieves state-of-the-art performance in various metrics using a challenging interactive instruction following benchmark in both seen and unseen environments by large margins (up to +10.70% in unseen env.).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reinforced Reasoning for Embodied Planning

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An SFT-plus-GRPO recipe lifts a 7B VLM to 35.6 percent success on EB-ALFRED versus 22.0 for GPT-4o-mini and 33.7 for Qwen2.5-VL-72B, with smaller but consistent gains on unseen EB-Habitat.

Pith tools