Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

LLM-Mini-CEX: Automatic Evaluation of Large Language Model for Diagnostic Conversation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.07635 v1 pith:HAICXY56 submitted 2023-08-15 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords llmsevaluationdiagnosismedicalcriteriondiagnosticmini-cexautomatic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

There is an increasing interest in developing LLMs for medical diagnosis to improve diagnosis efficiency. Despite their alluring technological potential, there is no unified and comprehensive evaluation criterion, leading to the inability to evaluate the quality and potential risks of medical LLMs, further hindering the application of LLMs in medical treatment scenarios. Besides, current evaluations heavily rely on labor-intensive interactions with LLMs to obtain diagnostic dialogues and human evaluation on the quality of diagnosis dialogue. To tackle the lack of unified and comprehensive evaluation criterion, we first initially establish an evaluation criterion, termed LLM-specific Mini-CEX to assess the diagnostic capabilities of LLMs effectively, based on original Mini-CEX. To address the labor-intensive interaction problem, we develop a patient simulator to engage in automatic conversations with LLMs, and utilize ChatGPT for evaluating diagnosis dialogues automatically. Experimental results show that the LLM-specific Mini-CEX is adequate and necessary to evaluate medical diagnosis dialogue. Besides, ChatGPT can replace manual evaluation on the metrics of humanistic qualities and provides reproducible and automated comparisons between different LLMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Novel Evaluation Benchmark for Medical LLMs: Illuminating Safety and Effectiveness in Clinical Domains

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new 2,069-item, 30-criterion benchmark of clinical scenarios shows six LLMs average 57.2%, with safety (54.7%) below effectiveness (62.3%) and a 13.3% drop in high-risk cases.

  2. MedRAG: Enhancing Retrieval-augmented Generation with Knowledge Graph-Elicited Reasoning for Healthcare Copilot

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MedRAG combines retrieval-augmented generation with a hierarchical diagnostic knowledge graph to improve diagnostic accuracy in healthcare copilots.

Pith tools