Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Challenges and Opportunities of Using Transformer-Based Multi-Task Learning in NLP Through ML Lifecycle: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.08234 v1 pith:GIVNG4DV submitted 2023-08-16 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

Challenges and Opportunities of Using Transformer-Based Multi-Task Learning in NLP Through ML Lifecycle: A Survey

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords modelstransformer-basedlearningtrainingchallengeslifecyclemodelphases
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The increasing adoption of natural language processing (NLP) models across industries has led to practitioners' need for machine learning systems to handle these models efficiently, from training to serving them in production. However, training, deploying, and updating multiple models can be complex, costly, and time-consuming, mainly when using transformer-based pre-trained language models. Multi-Task Learning (MTL) has emerged as a promising approach to improve efficiency and performance through joint training, rather than training separate models. Motivated by this, we first provide an overview of transformer-based MTL approaches in NLP. Then, we discuss the challenges and opportunities of using MTL approaches throughout typical ML lifecycle phases, specifically focusing on the challenges related to data engineering, model development, deployment, and monitoring phases. This survey focuses on transformer-based MTL architectures and, to the best of our knowledge, is novel in that it systematically analyses how transformer-based MTL in NLP fits into ML lifecycle phases. Furthermore, we motivate research on the connection between MTL and continual learning (CL), as this area remains unexplored. We believe it would be practical to have a model that can handle both MTL and CL, as this would make it easier to periodically re-train the model, update it due to distribution shifts, and add new capabilities to meet real-world requirements.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.