REVIEW 3 cited by
Evaluating Large Language Models on Graphs: Performance Insights and Comparative Analysis
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have garnered considerable interest within both academic and industrial. Yet, the application of LLMs to graph data remains under-explored. In this study, we evaluate the capabilities of four LLMs in addressing several analytical problems with graph data. We employ four distinct evaluation metrics: Comprehension, Correctness, Fidelity, and Rectification. Our results show that: 1) LLMs effectively comprehend graph data in natural language and reason with graph topology. 2) GPT models can generate logical and coherent results, outperforming alternatives in correctness. 3) All examined LLMs face challenges in structural reasoning, with techniques like zero-shot chain-of-thought and few-shot prompting showing diminished efficacy. 4) GPT models often produce erroneous answers in multi-answer tasks, raising concerns in fidelity. 5) GPT models exhibit elevated confidence in their outputs, potentially hindering their rectification capacities. Notably, GPT-4 has demonstrated the capacity to rectify responses from GPT-3.5-turbo and its own previous iterations. The code is available at: https://github.com/Ayame1006/LLMtoGraph.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
GraphTool-Instruction: Revolutionizing Graph Reasoning in LLMs through Decomposed Subtask Instruction
Decomposing graph reasoning into graph extraction, tool name identification, and tool parameter extraction subtasks yields large accuracy gains on small LLMs and a fine-tuned 8B model that competes with GPT-4o.
-
Investigating Student Interaction Patterns with Large Language Model-Powered Course Assistants in Computer Science Courses
A deployed LLM course assistant served 589 students across three CS courses; logs show heavy evening use and homework questions, while only about 11% of responses included AI follow-ups that students mostly ignored.
-
CARL-GT: Evaluating Causal Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models
A causal reasoning benchmark with graph and tabular data shows open-source LLMs are weak at causal discovery from tables, and reveals that task correlations do not align with the benchmark's three categories.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.