REVIEW 1 cited by
A Survey for Federated Learning Evaluations: Goals and Measures
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Evaluation is a systematic approach to assessing how well a system achieves its intended purpose. Federated learning (FL) is a novel paradigm for privacy-preserving machine learning that allows multiple parties to collaboratively train models without sharing sensitive data. However, evaluating FL is challenging due to its interdisciplinary nature and diverse goals, such as utility, efficiency, and security. In this survey, we first review the major evaluation goals adopted in the existing studies and then explore the evaluation metrics used for each goal. We also introduce FedEval, an open-source platform that provides a standardized and comprehensive evaluation framework for FL algorithms in terms of their utility, efficiency, and security. Finally, we discuss several challenges and future research directions for FL evaluation.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Securing Genomic Data Against Inference Attacks in Federated Learning Environments
In a synthetic federated learning setup with 100-SNP genomic data, a gradient-norm membership inference attack reached 0.87 F1-score, outperforming confidence-based membership inference and label inference attacks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.