Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Survey for Federated Learning Evaluations: Goals and Measures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.11841 v2 pith:5L7LDLOI submitted 2023-08-23 cs.LG cs.CRcs.DC

classification cs.LGcs.CRcs.DC
keywords evaluationgoalslearningefficiencyfederatedsecuritysurveyutility
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Evaluation is a systematic approach to assessing how well a system achieves its intended purpose. Federated learning (FL) is a novel paradigm for privacy-preserving machine learning that allows multiple parties to collaboratively train models without sharing sensitive data. However, evaluating FL is challenging due to its interdisciplinary nature and diverse goals, such as utility, efficiency, and security. In this survey, we first review the major evaluation goals adopted in the existing studies and then explore the evaluation metrics used for each goal. We also introduce FedEval, an open-source platform that provides a standardized and comprehensive evaluation framework for FL algorithms in terms of their utility, efficiency, and security. Finally, we discuss several challenges and future research directions for FL evaluation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Securing Genomic Data Against Inference Attacks in Federated Learning Environments

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    In a synthetic federated learning setup with 100-SNP genomic data, a gradient-norm membership inference attack reached 0.87 F1-score, outperforming confidence-based membership inference and label inference attacks.

Pith tools