Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Sparks of Large Audio Models: A Survey and Outlook

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.12792 v3 pith:LN7FKWPW submitted 2023-08-24 cs.SD eess.AS

classification cs.SDeess.AS
keywords audiomodelslargeprocessingtextitchallengesfoundationalgeneration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This survey paper provides a comprehensive overview of the recent advancements and challenges in applying large language models to the field of audio signal processing. Audio processing, with its diverse signal representations and a wide range of sources--from human voices to musical instruments and environmental sounds--poses challenges distinct from those found in traditional Natural Language Processing scenarios. Nevertheless, \textit{Large Audio Models}, epitomized by transformer-based architectures, have shown marked efficacy in this sphere. By leveraging massive amount of data, these models have demonstrated prowess in a variety of audio tasks, spanning from Automatic Speech Recognition and Text-To-Speech to Music Generation, among others. Notably, recently these Foundational Audio Models, like SeamlessM4T, have started showing abilities to act as universal translators, supporting multiple speech tasks for up to 100 languages without any reliance on separate task-specific systems. This paper presents an in-depth analysis of state-of-the-art methodologies regarding \textit{Foundational Large Audio Models}, their performance benchmarks, and their applicability to real-world scenarios. We also highlight current limitations and provide insights into potential future research directions in the realm of \textit{Large Audio Models} with the intent to spark further discussion, thereby fostering innovation in the next generation of audio-processing systems. Furthermore, to cope with the rapid development in this area, we will consistently update the relevant repository with relevant recent articles and their open-source implementations at https://github.com/EmulationAI/awesome-large-audio-models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multi-TW: Benchmarking Multimodal Models on Traditional Chinese Question Answering in Taiwan

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Multi-TW is the first Traditional Chinese benchmark to evaluate multimodal models on both image-text and audio-text questions while also measuring inference latency.

  2. The Man Behind the Sound: Demystifying Audio Private Attribute Profiling via Multimodal Large Language Model Agents

    cs.CR 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A multi-agent audio-language model framework can automatically profile private attributes, such as age, health, and income, directly from general audio recordings.

  3. XY-Tokenizer: Mitigating the Semantic-Acoustic Conflict in Low-Bitrate Speech Codecs

    cs.SD 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    XY-Tokenizer is a 1 kbps dual-channel speech codec that reports simultaneously strong text alignment and high speaker similarity, comparable to specialized codecs at similar bitrates.

  4. Probing the Robustness Properties of Neural Speech Codecs

    eess.AS 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DAC is the most noise-robust neural codec at high bitrates, but at 3 kbps EnCodec wins, and measured non-linearity correlates with robustness.

  5. Via Score to Performance: Efficient Human-Controllable Long Song Generation with Bar-Level Symbolic Notation

    cs.SD 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A bar-level symbolic-score song generator (BACH) is claimed to beat published systems and commercial Suno on human-rated quality, duration, and efficiency, but the supporting full text is corrupted and unverifiable.

Pith tools