REVIEW 8 cited by
AutoDroid: LLM-powered Task Automation in Android
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Mobile task automation is an attractive technique that aims to enable voice-based hands-free user interaction with smartphones. However, existing approaches suffer from poor scalability due to the limited language understanding ability and the non-trivial manual efforts required from developers or end-users. The recent advance of large language models (LLMs) in language understanding and reasoning inspires us to rethink the problem from a model-centric perspective, where task preparation, comprehension, and execution are handled by a unified language model. In this work, we introduce AutoDroid, a mobile task automation system capable of handling arbitrary tasks on any Android application without manual efforts. The key insight is to combine the commonsense knowledge of LLMs and domain-specific knowledge of apps through automated dynamic analysis. The main components include a functionality-aware UI representation method that bridges the UI with the LLM, exploration-based memory injection techniques that augment the app-specific domain knowledge of LLM, and a multi-granularity query optimization module that reduces the cost of model inference. We integrate AutoDroid with off-the-shelf LLMs including online GPT-4/GPT-3.5 and on-device Vicuna, and evaluate its performance on a new benchmark for memory-augmented Android task automation with 158 common tasks. The results demonstrated that AutoDroid is able to precisely generate actions with an accuracy of 90.9%, and complete tasks with a success rate of 71.3%, outperforming the GPT-4-powered baselines by 36.4% and 39.7%. The demo, benchmark suites, and source code of AutoDroid will be released at url{https://autodroid-sys.github.io/}.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
MobiBench: Multi-Branch, Modular Benchmark for Mobile GUI Agents
MobiBench reaches near-human offline evaluation fidelity for mobile GUI agents by accepting any valid action at each step, and enables modular attribution of performance to agent components.
-
A Comprehensive Study of Implementation Bugs in Multi-modal Agents
First systematic taxonomy of 158 multi-modal agent bugs plus a runtime analyzer that recovers most open issues and surfaces 31 new ones.
-
FuncDroid: Towards Inter-Functional Flows for Comprehensive Mobile App GUI Testing
An LLM-guided Android GUI tester that explicitly models inter-functional flows finds more bugs than coverage- or single-functionality-oriented baselines.
-
Screen2AX: Vision-Based Approach for Automatic macOS Accessibility Generation
Screen2AX generates hierarchical macOS accessibility metadata from a screenshot and reports improved GPT-4 UI task success compared with native accessibility and OmniParser V2.
-
Building a Stable Planner: An Extended Finite State Machine Based Planning Module for Mobile GUI Agent
A hand-authored EFSM planning module boosts Qwen2.5-VL-72B on AndroidWorld from 35.0% to 63.8% task success.
-
AppAgent-Claw: CLI Is All You Need for GUI Automation
A record-once, replay-many system converts demonstrated GUI workflows into reliable OpenClaw skills via layered visual localization and post-action validation, without runtime LLM inference.
-
Cybernaut: Towards Reliable Web Automation
A demonstration-to-SOP framework plus robust element identification and a trace similarity metric improves enterprise web automation success rates on an internal benchmark, with a fine-tuned consistency classifier rea...
-
Uncertainty-Aware GUI Agent: Adaptive Perception through Component Recommendation and Human-in-the-Loop Refinement
A GUI agent that trims UI input with a recommendation module and asks users when decisions are ambiguous reports state-of-the-art success rates, though the interaction module is not benchmarked.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.