REVIEW 2 cited by
Socratis: Are large multimodal models emotionally aware?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Existing emotion prediction benchmarks contain coarse emotion labels which do not consider the diversity of emotions that an image and text can elicit in humans due to various reasons. Learning diverse reactions to multimodal content is important as intelligent machines take a central role in generating and delivering content to society. To address this gap, we propose Socratis, a societal reactions benchmark, where each image-caption (IC) pair is annotated with multiple emotions and the reasons for feeling them. Socratis contains 18K free-form reactions for 980 emotions on 2075 image-caption pairs from 5 widely-read news and image-caption (IC) datasets. We benchmark the capability of state-of-the-art multimodal large language models to generate the reasons for feeling an emotion given an IC pair. Based on a preliminary human study, we observe that humans prefer human-written reasons over 2 times more often than machine-generated ones. This shows our task is harder than standard generation tasks because it starkly contrasts recent findings where humans cannot tell apart machine vs human-written news articles, for instance. We further see that current captioning metrics based on large vision-language models also fail to correlate with human preferences. We hope that these findings and our benchmark will inspire further research on training emotionally aware models.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Chart-to-Experience: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs for Predicting Experiential Impact of Charts
Multimodal LLMs underperform humans at directly rating charts' experiential impact, but they are substantially better at pairwise comparisons, especially when the human ratings differ clearly.
-
Evaluating Vision-Language Models for Emotion Recognition
Vision-language models are weak and prompt-sensitive at evoked emotion recognition, and many fine-grained errors are best explained by noisy dataset labels.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.