Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Socratis: Are large multimodal models emotionally aware?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.16741 v3 pith:ZLF4LRU4 submitted 2023-08-31 cs.AI cs.CV

classification cs.AIcs.CV
keywords modelsreasonsbenchmarkemotionemotionshumansimage-captionlarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Existing emotion prediction benchmarks contain coarse emotion labels which do not consider the diversity of emotions that an image and text can elicit in humans due to various reasons. Learning diverse reactions to multimodal content is important as intelligent machines take a central role in generating and delivering content to society. To address this gap, we propose Socratis, a societal reactions benchmark, where each image-caption (IC) pair is annotated with multiple emotions and the reasons for feeling them. Socratis contains 18K free-form reactions for 980 emotions on 2075 image-caption pairs from 5 widely-read news and image-caption (IC) datasets. We benchmark the capability of state-of-the-art multimodal large language models to generate the reasons for feeling an emotion given an IC pair. Based on a preliminary human study, we observe that humans prefer human-written reasons over 2 times more often than machine-generated ones. This shows our task is harder than standard generation tasks because it starkly contrasts recent findings where humans cannot tell apart machine vs human-written news articles, for instance. We further see that current captioning metrics based on large vision-language models also fail to correlate with human preferences. We hope that these findings and our benchmark will inspire further research on training emotionally aware models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Chart-to-Experience: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs for Predicting Experiential Impact of Charts

    cs.HC 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Multimodal LLMs underperform humans at directly rating charts' experiential impact, but they are substantially better at pairwise comparisons, especially when the human ratings differ clearly.

  2. Evaluating Vision-Language Models for Emotion Recognition

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Vision-language models are weak and prompt-sensitive at evoked emotion recognition, and many fine-grained errors are best explained by noisy dataset labels.

Pith tools