Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

XGen-7B Technical Report

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.03450 v1 pith:RWJM7VDI submitted 2023-09-07 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords modelsllmsopen-sourcesequencexgenevaluationk-sequenceresearch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have become ubiquitous across various domains, transforming the way we interact with information and conduct research. However, most high-performing LLMs remain confined behind proprietary walls, hindering scientific progress. Most open-source LLMs, on the other hand, are limited in their ability to support longer sequence lengths, which is a key requirement for many tasks that require inference over an input context. To address this, we have trained XGen, a series of 7B parameter models on up to 8K sequence length for up to 1.5T tokens. We have also finetuned the XGen models on public-domain instructional data, creating their instruction-tuned counterparts (XGen-Inst). We open-source our models for both research advancements and commercial applications. Our evaluation on standard benchmarks shows that XGen models achieve comparable or better results when compared with state-of-the-art open-source LLMs. Our targeted evaluation on long sequence modeling tasks shows the benefits of our 8K-sequence models over 2K-sequence open-source LLMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Long Context vs. RAG for LLMs: An Evaluation and Revisits

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LC generally outperforms RAG on filtered long-context QA, but RAG wins on dialogue and general yes/no questions.

  2. ViUniT: Visual Unit Tests for More Robust Visual Programming

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ViUniT automatically generates synthetic image-answer unit tests to evaluate visual programs, improving selection, re-prompting, refusal, and reinforcement learning across VQA and image-text matching.

  3. From Chatbot to Digital Colleague: The Paradigm Shift Toward Persistent Autonomous AI

    cs.AI 2026-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Autonomous AI becomes dependable when tool use is embedded in persistent workspaces with reusable skills, shifting evaluation from answers to task closure.

Pith tools