REVIEW 3 cited by
On Induced Versions of Menger's Theorem on Sparse Graphs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Let $A$ and $B$ be sets of vertices in a graph $G$. Menger's theorem states that for every positive integer $k$, either there exists a collection of $k$ vertex-disjoint paths between $A$ and $B$, or $A$ can be separated from $B$ by a set of at most $k-1$ vertices. Let $\Delta$ be the maximum degree of $G$. We show that there exists a function $f(\Delta) = (\Delta+1)^{\Delta^2+1}$, so that for every positive integer $k$, either there exists a collection of $k$ vertex-disjoint and pairwise anticomplete paths between $A$ and $B$, or $A$ can be separated from $B$ by a set of at most $k \cdot f(\Delta)$ vertices. We also show that the result can be generalized from bounded-degree graphs to graphs excluding a topological minor. On the negative side, we show that no such relation holds on graphs that have degeneracy 2 and arbitrarily large girth, even when $k = 2$. Similar results were obtained independently and concurrently by Hendrey, Norin, Steiner, and Turcotte [arXiv:2309.07905].
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Fatness and Flatness
Excluding a fixed graph as a fat minor forces a metric analog of uniform quasi-wideness; this bounds scatter dimension and yields EPAS-style approximation for norm k-clustering.
-
Excluding a Ladder as an Induced Minor in Graphs Without Induced Stars
Every K_{1,d}-free graph that excludes the k-ladder as an induced minor has tree-independence number bounded by a function of k and d.
-
A coarse block-cut tree theorem
Every graph admits a tree decomposition with small-diameter adhesion sets where same-bag vertices cannot be separated by small, distant vertex sets.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.