REVIEW 1 cited by
Evaluating Classification Systems Against Soft Labels with Fuzzy Precision and Recall
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Classification systems are normally trained by minimizing the cross-entropy between system outputs and reference labels, which makes the Kullback-Leibler divergence a natural choice for measuring how closely the system can follow the data. Precision and recall provide another perspective for measuring the performance of a classification system. Non-binary references can arise from various sources, and it is often beneficial to use the soft labels for training instead of the binarized data. However, the existing definitions for precision and recall require binary reference labels, and binarizing the data can cause erroneous interpretations. We present a novel method to calculate precision, recall and F-score without quantizing the data. The proposed metrics extend the well established metrics as the definitions coincide when used with binary labels. To understand the behavior of the metrics we show simple example cases and an evaluation of different sound event detection models trained on real data with soft labels.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Novel Method to Evaluate Models on Unreliable, Noisy and Inconsistent Labels: Adaptive Resolution Label Aggregation (ARLA)
Adaptive Resolution Label Aggregation (ARLA) coarsens label and prediction together at chosen subpatch size and sensitivity so evaluation metrics better reflect true model error on noisy segmentation labels.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.