Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

An In-depth Survey of Large Language Model-based Artificial Intelligence Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.14365 v1 pith:5JSRAXJW submitted 2023-09-23 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords agentsin-depthlanguagememoryagentcapabilitiescharacteristicsclassification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Due to the powerful capabilities demonstrated by large language model (LLM), there has been a recent surge in efforts to integrate them with AI agents to enhance their performance. In this paper, we have explored the core differences and characteristics between LLM-based AI agents and traditional AI agents. Specifically, we first compare the fundamental characteristics of these two types of agents, clarifying the significant advantages of LLM-based agents in handling natural language, knowledge storage, and reasoning capabilities. Subsequently, we conducted an in-depth analysis of the key components of AI agents, including planning, memory, and tool use. Particularly, for the crucial component of memory, this paper introduced an innovative classification scheme, not only departing from traditional classification methods but also providing a fresh perspective on the design of an AI agent's memory system. We firmly believe that in-depth research and understanding of these core components will lay a solid foundation for the future advancement of AI agent technology. At the end of the paper, we provide directional suggestions for further research in this field, with the hope of offering valuable insights to scholars and researchers in the field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A dataset of early blockchain-registered AI agents on Ethereum

    cs.DB 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A structured dataset of the first 10,000 ERC-8004 AI agents on Ethereum, including identity, reputation, and metadata tables at a fixed block snapshot.

  2. Agent Safety Alignment via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    RL-based safety alignment with an execute-refuse-verify policy improves reported threat resistance for tool-using agents, but utility preservation is not consistently demonstrated.

  3. Leveraging a Multi-Agent LLM-Based System to Educate Teachers in Hate Incidents Management

    cs.CY 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A multi-agent LLM system with retrieval augmentation and persona modeling shows promise for teacher training on hate incident management, though the evidence is based on a small pilot.

  4. Integrating Traditional Technical Analysis with AI: A Multi-Agent LLM-Based Approach to Stock Market Forecasting

    cs.CE 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    An LLM-based multi-agent system that identifies Elliott Wave patterns achieved 44-89% directional accuracy on six US stocks, with deep reinforcement learning backtesting improving accuracy on most but not all test cases.

  5. Intelligent Assistants for the Semiconductor Failure Analysis with LLM-Based Planning Agents

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An LLM-based planning agent using ReAct, retrieval tools, and RAG can autonomously answer semiconductor failure analysis queries in an industrial setting, with best average quality 3.6/5.

  6. ElliottAgents: A Natural Language-Driven Multi-Agent System for Stock Market Analysis and Prediction

    cs.CE 2025-07 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A natural-language multi-agent system combines Elliott Wave pattern detection with LLM dialogue and DRL backtesting to generate stock predictions, supported only by small selected experiments.

Pith tools