REVIEW 3 cited by
A Primer on Bayesian Neural Networks: Review and Debates
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Neural networks have achieved remarkable performance across various problem domains, but their widespread applicability is hindered by inherent limitations such as overconfidence in predictions, lack of interpretability, and vulnerability to adversarial attacks. To address these challenges, Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) have emerged as a compelling extension of conventional neural networks, integrating uncertainty estimation into their predictive capabilities. This comprehensive primer presents a systematic introduction to the fundamental concepts of neural networks and Bayesian inference, elucidating their synergistic integration for the development of BNNs. The target audience comprises statisticians with a potential background in Bayesian methods but lacking deep learning expertise, as well as machine learners proficient in deep neural networks but with limited exposure to Bayesian statistics. We provide an overview of commonly employed priors, examining their impact on model behavior and performance. Additionally, we delve into the practical considerations associated with training and inference in BNNs. Furthermore, we explore advanced topics within the realm of BNN research, acknowledging the existence of ongoing debates and controversies. By offering insights into cutting-edge developments, this primer not only equips researchers and practitioners with a solid foundation in BNNs, but also illuminates the potential applications of this dynamic field. As a valuable resource, it fosters an understanding of BNNs and their promising prospects, facilitating further advancements in the pursuit of knowledge and innovation.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Emulating compact binary population synthesis simulations with uncertainty quantification and model comparison using Bayesian normalizing flows
A Bayesian normalizing flow trained with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo provides well-calibrated uncertainty estimates for population synthesis emulators of black hole mergers.
-
Last Layer Hamiltonian Monte Carlo
Last-layer Hamiltonian Monte Carlo is competitive with other probabilistic last-layer methods on driver action and intention recognition, and more samples help OOD detection but not accuracy.
-
Uncertainty quantification for trustworthy deep learning: Methods and measures
A structured survey separates UQ methods from uncertainty measures, rates ensemble and single-pass families on cost and quality, and flags open gaps in efficient epistemic scoring and last-layer diversity.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.