Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

ABScribe: Rapid Exploration & Organization of Multiple Writing Variations in Human-AI Co-Writing Tasks using Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.00117 v4 pith:MQUHR6GB submitted 2023-09-29 cs.HC cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.HCcs.AIcs.LG
keywords variationsabscribewritingrapidtextwritersco-writingexploration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Exploring alternative ideas by rewriting text is integral to the writing process. State-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) can simplify writing variation generation. However, current interfaces pose challenges for simultaneous consideration of multiple variations: creating new variations without overwriting text can be difficult, and pasting them sequentially can clutter documents, increasing workload and disrupting writers' flow. To tackle this, we present ABScribe, an interface that supports rapid, yet visually structured, exploration and organization of writing variations in human-AI co-writing tasks. With ABScribe, users can swiftly modify variations using LLM prompts, which are auto-converted into reusable buttons. Variations are stored adjacently within text fields for rapid in-place comparisons using mouse-over interactions on a popup toolbar. Our user study with 12 writers shows that ABScribe significantly reduces task workload (d = 1.20, p < 0.001), enhances user perceptions of the revision process (d = 2.41, p < 0.001) compared to a popular baseline workflow, and provides insights into how writers explore variations using LLMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 3 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Narrative Keyframing for Generative Creative Writing

    cs.HC 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Narrative keyframing uses plot, character, and perspective keyframes to let writers control AI-generated stories, with a 12-writer study reporting higher perceived control and richer characterization.

  2. VideoDiff: Human-AI Video Co-Creation with Alternatives

    cs.HC 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Aligned timeline and transcript views for multiple AI-generated video edits let creators compare and refine alternatives roughly twice as fast, with lower workload and higher final-video satisfaction, in a within-subj...

Pith tools