REVIEW 2 cited by
Demystifying Embedding Spaces using Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Embeddings have become a pivotal means to represent complex, multi-faceted information about entities, concepts, and relationships in a condensed and useful format. Nevertheless, they often preclude direct interpretation. While downstream tasks make use of these compressed representations, meaningful interpretation usually requires visualization using dimensionality reduction or specialized machine learning interpretability methods. This paper addresses the challenge of making such embeddings more interpretable and broadly useful, by employing Large Language Models (LLMs) to directly interact with embeddings -- transforming abstract vectors into understandable narratives. By injecting embeddings into LLMs, we enable querying and exploration of complex embedding data. We demonstrate our approach on a variety of diverse tasks, including: enhancing concept activation vectors (CAVs), communicating novel embedded entities, and decoding user preferences in recommender systems. Our work couples the immense information potential of embeddings with the interpretative power of LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
inversedMixup: Data Augmentation via Inverting Mixed Embeddings
Mixing BERT embeddings and inverting them into text with LLaMA produces interpretable augmented sentences, improves few-shot classification on some datasets, and exposes 'manifold intrusion' in text Mixup.
-
Embedding-to-Prefix: Parameter-Efficient Personalization for Pre-Trained Large Language Models
E2P projects pre-computed user embeddings into a single soft prefix token for frozen LLMs, reporting gains on four personalization tasks, though its reproduction scripts write zero embeddings.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.