Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Instruction Tuning with Human Curriculum

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.09518 v4 pith:D2NXDQHF submitted 2023-10-14 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords instructioncurriculumhumantuningachievedadvantagesdatageneration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, we (1) introduce Curriculum Instruction Tuning, (2) explore the potential advantages of employing diverse curriculum strategies, and (3) delineate a synthetic instruction-response generation framework that complements our theoretical approach. Distinct from the existing instruction tuning dataset, our generation pipeline is systematically structured to emulate the sequential and orderly characteristic of human learning. Additionally, we describe a methodology for generating instruction-response datasets that extensively span the various stages of human education, from middle school through the graduate level, utilizing educational subject catalogs. Before training, we meticulously organize the instruction data to ensure that questions escalate in difficulty regarding (A) the subject matter and (B) the intricacy of the instructions. The findings of our study reveal that substantial improvements in performance can be achieved through the mere application of curriculum ordering to instruction data (achieving gains of +4.76 on TruthfulQA, +2.98 on MMLU, +2.8 on OpenbookQA, and +1.28 on ARC-hard) compared to random shuffling. This enhancement is achieved without incurring additional computational expenses. Through comprehensive experimentation, we observe that the advantages of our proposed method are consistently evident across nine benchmarks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating and Improving Graph to Text Generation with Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Introducing PlanGTG, a 29k-pair instruction dataset with reordering and attribution subtasks, and fine-tuning 7B LLMs on it improves graph-to-text generation on WebNLG and DART over untuned and dataset-tuned baselines.

  2. Empowering Large Language Models in Wireless Communication: A Novel Dataset and Fine-Tuning Framework

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An LLM-generated wireless dataset and a Pointwise V-Information difficulty-ordering method are proposed, with reported fine-tuning gains of about 1 to 2 percent and a 0.209 absolute ROUGE-L improvement on a 200-docume...

Pith tools