REVIEW 2 cited by
Harnessing the Power of LLMs: Evaluating Human-AI Text Co-Creation through the Lens of News Headline Generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
To explore how humans can best leverage LLMs for writing and how interacting with these models affects feelings of ownership and trust in the writing process, we compared common human-AI interaction types (e.g., guiding system, selecting from system outputs, post-editing outputs) in the context of LLM-assisted news headline generation. While LLMs alone can generate satisfactory news headlines, on average, human control is needed to fix undesirable model outputs. Of the interaction methods, guiding and selecting model output added the most benefit with the lowest cost (in time and effort). Further, AI assistance did not harm participants' perception of control compared to freeform editing.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
FeedQUAC: Quick Unobtrusive AI-Generated Commentary
An ambient AI design companion that reads out short persona-based feedback from screenshots was rated by eight 3D CAD designers as low-pressure, convenient, and useful for inspiration and validation.
-
KG-Retriever: Efficient Knowledge Indexing for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
A retrieval-augmented generation system that combines an entity knowledge graph and a document similarity graph to answer multi-hop questions accurately in a single retrieval pass.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.