Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Impact of Guidance and Interaction Strategies for LLM Use on Learner Performance and Perception

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.13712 v3 pith:6RH5SEBO submitted 2023-10-13 cs.HC cs.AI

classification cs.HCcs.AI
keywords guidanceimpactlearnersllmsperformanceclassroomdirectincreasing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Personalized chatbot-based teaching assistants can be crucial in addressing increasing classroom sizes, especially where direct teacher presence is limited. Large language models (LLMs) offer a promising avenue, with increasing research exploring their educational utility. However, the challenge lies not only in establishing the efficacy of LLMs but also in discerning the nuances of interaction between learners and these models, which impact learners' engagement and results. We conducted a formative study in an undergraduate computer science classroom (N=145) and a controlled experiment on Prolific (N=356) to explore the impact of four pedagogically informed guidance strategies on the learners' performance, confidence and trust in LLMs. Direct LLM answers marginally improved performance, while refining student solutions fostered trust. Structured guidance reduced random queries as well as instances of students copy-pasting assignment questions to the LLM. Our work highlights the role that teachers can play in shaping LLM-supported learning environments.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. It Matters How You Say It: Exploring Rhetorical Patterns for AI-Assisted Information Evaluation

    cs.HC 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a 98-participant fact-checking study, the rhetorical style of AI advice changed accuracy, confidence, and preference, with step-by-step explanations helping most and user preference diverging from performance.

  2. The Sample Complexity of Online Strategic Decision Making with Information Asymmetry and Knowledge Transportability

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An optimism-based algorithm with nonparametric instrumental variables learns an epsilon-optimal policy under information asymmetry and knowledge transfer with O~(1/epsilon^2) sample complexity.

  3. Humanizing Automated Programming Feedback: Fine-Tuning Generative Models with Student-Written Feedback

    cs.CY 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning small open language models on student-written feedback produces shorter and more accurate feedback than prompt engineering on the same 30 programs, but the test set overlaps the training data.

  4. Structured Prompts, Better Outcomes? Exploring the Effects of a Structured Interface with ChatGPT in a Graduate Robotics Course

    cs.CY 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A structured prompting interface temporarily increased clear code-focused prompts and self-written input, but behaviors did not transfer to free ChatGPT use, and learning and performance did not improve.

Pith tools