REVIEW 7 cited by
Copyright Violations and Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Language models may memorize more than just facts, including entire chunks of texts seen during training. Fair use exemptions to copyright laws typically allow for limited use of copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder, but typically for extraction of information from copyrighted materials, rather than {\em verbatim} reproduction. This work explores the issue of copyright violations and large language models through the lens of verbatim memorization, focusing on possible redistribution of copyrighted text. We present experiments with a range of language models over a collection of popular books and coding problems, providing a conservative characterization of the extent to which language models can redistribute these materials. Overall, this research highlights the need for further examination and the potential impact on future developments in natural language processing to ensure adherence to copyright regulations. Code is at \url{https://github.com/coastalcph/CopyrightLLMs}.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
MATH-Perturb: Benchmarking LLMs' Math Reasoning Abilities against Hard Perturbations
Hard perturbations that change the required solution method cause 10-25% accuracy drops across 18 LLMs on MATH, revealing limits in reasoning robustness.
-
Probabilistic "Copies" in Generative AI Models
An LLM is an infringing copy of a work only when the work can be extracted from it with relatively little effort, so some models are copies of some works and no model is a copy of everything it trained on.
-
Maximizing Local Entropy Where It Matters: Prefix-Aware Localized LLM Unlearning
PALU shows that unlearning only needs local intervention—the first few tokens of the sensitive span and the top-k logits—not full-sequence, full-vocabulary suppression.
-
Leak@$k$: Unlearning Does Not Make LLMs Forget Under Probabilistic Decoding
LLM unlearning methods that pass greedy-decoding benchmarks leak forgotten facts when the model is sampled repeatedly, and the new leak@k metric quantifies this.
-
UCD: Unlearning in LLMs via Contrastive Decoding
UCD steers an LLM away from forget-set content at inference time by mixing in the difference between forget-tuned and retain-tuned small models.
-
SoK: The Privacy Paradox of Large Language Models: Advancements, Privacy Risks, and Mitigation
A systematization-of-knowledge survey that categorizes LLM privacy risks into training data, prompts, outputs, and agents, and reviews limitations of current mitigations.
-
The Scales of Justitia: A Comprehensive Survey on Safety Evaluation of LLMs
A structured survey of LLM safety evaluation that proposes a why/what/where/how taxonomy and catalogs metrics, datasets, benchmarks, evaluators, and frameworks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.