REVIEW 4 cited by
Branch-Solve-Merge Improves Large Language Model Evaluation and Generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are frequently used for multi-faceted language generation and evaluation tasks that involve satisfying intricate user constraints or taking into account multiple aspects and criteria. However, their performance can fall short, due to the model's lack of coherence and inability to plan and decompose the problem. We propose Branch-Solve-Merge (BSM), a Large Language Model program (Schlag et al., 2023) for tackling such challenging natural language tasks. It consists of branch, solve, and merge modules that are parameterized with specific prompts to the base LLM. These three modules plan a decomposition of the task into multiple parallel sub-tasks, independently solve them, and fuse the solutions to the sub-tasks. We apply our method to the tasks of LLM response evaluation and constrained text generation and evaluate its effectiveness with multiple LLMs, including Vicuna, LLaMA-2-chat, and GPT-4. BSM improves the evaluation correctness and consistency for each LLM by enhancing human-LLM agreement by up to 26%, reducing length and pairwise position biases by up to 50%, and allowing LLaMA2-chat to match or outperform GPT-4 on most domains. On a constraint story generation task, BSM improves the coherence of stories while also improving constraint satisfaction by 12%.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Deep Interaction: An Efficient Human-AI Interaction Method for Large Reasoning Models
Directly editing a large reasoning model's chain-of-thought and feeding back a distilled version of the edit improves correction success by over 25% and cuts token usage by roughly 40% versus dialogue-based correction.
-
Hierarchical Divide-and-Conquer for Fine-Grained Alignment in LLM-Based Medical Evaluation
HDCEval splits medical answer grading into relevance, correctness, and expression checks, uses reward-token-trained expert models, and reports improved agreement with human doctors.
-
Agent-Centric Projection of Prompting Techniques and Implications for Synthetic Training Data for Large Language Models
The paper defines linear and non-linear interaction contexts for LLMs and conjectures that prompting techniques and multi-agent systems are equivalent projections of the same patterns.
-
Igniting Creative Writing in Small Language Models: LLM-as-a-Judge versus Multi-Agent Refined Rewards
An adversarially tuned LLM-as-a-Judge reward signal outperforms a multi-agent-refined reward model for fine-tuning a 7B SLM on Chinese greeting generation, though the comparison is weakened by circular evaluation and ...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.