Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Simple Baselines for Projection-based Full-reference and No-reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.17147 v1 pith:F7NOJNSX submitted 2023-10-26 cs.CV eess.IV

classification cs.CVeess.IV
keywords qualitypointcloudsrepresentationassessmentbaselineschallengecloud
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Point clouds are widely used in 3D content representation and have various applications in multimedia. However, compression and simplification processes inevitably result in the loss of quality-aware information under storage and bandwidth constraints. Therefore, there is an increasing need for effective methods to quantify the degree of distortion in point clouds. In this paper, we propose simple baselines for projection-based point cloud quality assessment (PCQA) to tackle this challenge. We use multi-projections obtained via a common cube-like projection process from the point clouds for both full-reference (FR) and no-reference (NR) PCQA tasks. Quality-aware features are extracted with popular vision backbones. The FR quality representation is computed as the similarity between the feature maps of reference and distorted projections while the NR quality representation is obtained by simply squeezing the feature maps of distorted projections with average pooling The corresponding quality representations are regressed into visual quality scores by fully-connected layers. Taking part in the ICIP 2023 PCVQA Challenge, we succeeded in achieving the top spot in four out of the five competition tracks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Who is a Better Talker: Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment for AI-Generated Talking Heads

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new large dataset and the FSCD model improve automated quality scoring of AI-generated talking-head videos, beating 15 baselines in correlation with human ratings.

  2. Point Cloud Compression and Objective Quality Assessment: A Survey

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey of point cloud compression and objective quality assessment that benchmarks representative methods on standard datasets and distills design insights.

Pith tools