Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Domain Generalization in Computational Pathology: Survey and Guidelines

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.19656 v1 pith:JKPEARZJ submitted 2023-10-30 eess.IV cs.CVcs.LG

classification eess.IVcs.CVcs.LG
keywords cpathguidelinesdomaingeneralizationmodelsanalysisapplicationscomputational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep learning models have exhibited exceptional effectiveness in Computational Pathology (CPath) by tackling intricate tasks across an array of histology image analysis applications. Nevertheless, the presence of out-of-distribution data (stemming from a multitude of sources such as disparate imaging devices and diverse tissue preparation methods) can cause \emph{domain shift} (DS). DS decreases the generalization of trained models to unseen datasets with slightly different data distributions, prompting the need for innovative \emph{domain generalization} (DG) solutions. Recognizing the potential of DG methods to significantly influence diagnostic and prognostic models in cancer studies and clinical practice, we present this survey along with guidelines on achieving DG in CPath. We rigorously define various DS types, systematically review and categorize existing DG approaches and resources in CPath, and provide insights into their advantages, limitations, and applicability. We also conduct thorough benchmarking experiments with 28 cutting-edge DG algorithms to address a complex DG problem. Our findings suggest that careful experiment design and CPath-specific Stain Augmentation technique can be very effective. However, there is no one-size-fits-all solution for DG in CPath. Therefore, we establish clear guidelines for detecting and managing DS depending on different scenarios. While most of the concepts, guidelines, and recommendations are given for applications in CPath, we believe that they are applicable to most medical image analysis tasks as well.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Are nuclear masks all you need for improved out-of-domain generalisation? A closer look at cancer classification in histopathology

    eess.IV 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Adding nuclear-segmentation-mask supervision with embedding alignment during training improves out-of-domain cancer classification in histopathology.

  2. Robustifying pathology foundation models via fine-tuning

    cs.CV 2026-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A uniform fine-tuning step improves acquisition robustness and downstream performance across ten pathology foundation models, but the paper never discloses the fine-tuning recipe.

Pith tools