REVIEW 5 cited by
Practical Membership Inference Attacks against Fine-tuned Large Language Models via Self-prompt Calibration
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Membership Inference Attacks (MIA) aim to infer whether a target data record has been utilized for model training or not. Existing MIAs designed for large language models (LLMs) can be bifurcated into two types: reference-free and reference-based attacks. Although reference-based attacks appear promising performance by calibrating the probability measured on the target model with reference models, this illusion of privacy risk heavily depends on a reference dataset that closely resembles the training set. Both two types of attacks are predicated on the hypothesis that training records consistently maintain a higher probability of being sampled. However, this hypothesis heavily relies on the overfitting of target models, which will be mitigated by multiple regularization methods and the generalization of LLMs. Thus, these reasons lead to high false-positive rates of MIAs in practical scenarios. We propose a Membership Inference Attack based on Self-calibrated Probabilistic Variation (SPV-MIA). Specifically, we introduce a self-prompt approach, which constructs the dataset to fine-tune the reference model by prompting the target LLM itself. In this manner, the adversary can collect a dataset with a similar distribution from public APIs. Furthermore, we introduce probabilistic variation, a more reliable membership signal based on LLM memorization rather than overfitting, from which we rediscover the neighbour attack with theoretical grounding. Comprehensive evaluation conducted on three datasets and four exemplary LLMs shows that SPV-MIA raises the AUC of MIAs from 0.7 to a significantly high level of 0.9. Our code and dataset are available at: https://github.com/tsinghua-fib-lab/NeurIPS2024_SPV-MIA
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Leak It: A Probabilistic Approach to Training-Data Extraction from Black-Box Language Models
Sampling-based LLM attacks reproduce exact identifiers from 16.6% of 500 Pile documents at Pythia-6.9B even though aggregate sampling-MIA adds no signal over blind baselines, so privacy audits should report per-docume...
-
Tuning without Peeking: Provable Generalization Bounds and Robust LLM Post-Training
A black-box evolutionary post-training method for LLMs with compression-based generalization and robustness bounds, showing small empirical gains on math reasoning plus strong resistance to membership inference.
-
Large Language Model Adversarial Landscape Through the Lens of Attack Objectives
A survey that re-frames LLM adversarial attacks and defenses around four attacker objectives: privacy, integrity, availability, and misuse.
-
SoK: The Privacy Paradox of Large Language Models: Advancements, Privacy Risks, and Mitigation
A systematization-of-knowledge survey that categorizes LLM privacy risks into training data, prompts, outputs, and agents, and reviews limitations of current mitigations.
-
A Survey: Towards Privacy and Security in Mobile Large Language Models
A survey of privacy and security challenges for mobile large language models, summarizing known attack types and defenses without introducing new results.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.