Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Unifying Corroborative and Contributive Attributions in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.12233 v1 pith:7NNBGV6X submitted 2023-11-20 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords attributionattributionsframeworklanguagetypeslargemodelsunified
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

As businesses, products, and services spring up around large language models, the trustworthiness of these models hinges on the verifiability of their outputs. However, methods for explaining language model outputs largely fall across two distinct fields of study which both use the term "attribution" to refer to entirely separate techniques: citation generation and training data attribution. In many modern applications, such as legal document generation and medical question answering, both types of attributions are important. In this work, we argue for and present a unified framework of large language model attributions. We show how existing methods of different types of attribution fall under the unified framework. We also use the framework to discuss real-world use cases where one or both types of attributions are required. We believe that this unified framework will guide the use case driven development of systems that leverage both types of attribution, as well as the standardization of their evaluation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How Context Attribution Handles What the Model Already Knows

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Context attribution methods cannot disentangle in-context from in-weight knowledge and assign unfaithful scores under overlap; new metrics and WMDP-Cyber++ quantify the failure.

  2. GenerationPrograms: Fine-grained Attribution with Executable Programs

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GenerationPrograms, a program-then-execute generation framework, substantially improves document- and sentence-level attribution quality in long-form QA and multi-document summarization compared with direct citation g...

  3. SelfCite: Self-Supervised Alignment for Context Attribution in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SelfCite uses context-ablation probability differences as a self-supervised reward to improve LLM sentence-level citations, raising LongBench-Cite citation F1 from 73.8 to 79.1.

Pith tools