Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Conditions for Length Generalization in Learning Reasoning Skills

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.16173 v2 pith:2NHXYUCI submitted 2023-11-22 cs.AI cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords reasoninggeneralizationlengththeoreticalconditionsevaluationslearninglengths
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reasoning is a fundamental capability of AI agents. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable abilities to perform reasoning tasks. However, numerous evaluations of the reasoning capabilities of LLMs have also showed some limitations. An outstanding limitation is length generalization, meaning that when trained on reasoning problems of smaller lengths or sizes, the resulting models struggle with problems of larger sizes or lengths. This potentially indicates some theoretical limitations of generalization in learning reasoning skills. These evaluations and their observations motivated us to perform a theoretical study of the length generalization problem. This work focuses on reasoning tasks that can be formulated as Markov dynamic processes (MDPs) and/or directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). It identifies and proves conditions that decide whether the length generalization problem can be solved or not for a reasoning task in a particular representation. Experiments are also conducted to verify the theoretical results.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Enhancing Auto-regressive Chain-of-Thought through Loop-Aligned Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Loop-aligned supervision lets a looped Transformer generate CoT chains beyond training length, and those chains improve an auto-regressive CoT model's length generalization.

  2. Ignore the KL Penalty! Boosting Exploration on Critical Tokens to Enhance RL Fine-Tuning

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A certainty-weighted KL penalty that down-weights the penalty on low-confidence tokens improves RL fine-tuning exploration for arithmetic in GPT-2.

Pith tools