Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Double Machine Learning for Static Panel Models with Fixed Effects

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.08174 v5 pith:YN4LMGCG submitted 2023-12-13 econ.EM cs.LGstat.ML

classification econ.EMcs.LGstat.ML
keywords learningeffectsmachineproceduresalgorithmsfixednonlinearpanel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in causal inference have seen the development of methods which make use of the predictive power of machine learning algorithms. In this paper, we develop novel double machine learning (DML) procedures for panel data in which these algorithms are used to approximate high-dimensional and nonlinear nuisance functions of the covariates. Our new procedures are extensions of the well-known correlated random effects, within-group and first-difference estimators from linear to nonlinear panel models, specifically, Robinson (1988)'s partially linear regression model with fixed effects and unspecified nonlinear confounding. Our simulation study assesses the performance of these procedures using different machine learning algorithms. We use our procedures to re-estimate the impact of minimum wage on voting behaviour in the UK. From our results, we recommend the use of first-differencing because it imposes the fewest constraints on the distribution of the fixed effects, and an ensemble learning strategy to ensure optimum estimator accuracy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dynamic Synthetic Controls vs. Panel-Aware Double Machine Learning for Geo-Level Marketing Impact Estimation

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A simulation benchmark finds panel-aware DML more robust than augmented synthetic controls in several geo-marketing stress tests, though coverage gains are inconsistent and no code is shipped.

Pith tools