Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Fluctuation-based Adaptive Structured Pruning for Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.11983 v1 pith:O3DGTENR submitted 2023-12-19 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords pruningstructuredllmsflaplanguageretraining-freeadaptiveadaptively
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Network Pruning is a promising way to address the huge computing resource demands of the deployment and inference of Large Language Models (LLMs). Retraining-free is important for LLMs' pruning methods. However, almost all of the existing retraining-free pruning approaches for LLMs focus on unstructured pruning, which requires specific hardware support for acceleration. In this paper, we propose a novel retraining-free structured pruning framework for LLMs, named FLAP (FLuctuation-based Adaptive Structured Pruning). It is hardware-friendly by effectively reducing storage and enhancing inference speed. For effective structured pruning of LLMs, we highlight three critical elements that demand the utmost attention: formulating structured importance metrics, adaptively searching the global compressed model, and implementing compensation mechanisms to mitigate performance loss. First, FLAP determines whether the output feature map is easily recoverable when a column of weight is removed, based on the fluctuation pruning metric. Then it standardizes the importance scores to adaptively determine the global compressed model structure. At last, FLAP adds additional bias terms to recover the output feature maps using the baseline values. We thoroughly evaluate our approach on a variety of language benchmarks. Without any retraining, our method significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art methods, including LLM-Pruner and the extension of Wanda in structured pruning. The code is released at https://github.com/CASIA-IVA-Lab/FLAP.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Faithfulness to Refusal: A Causal Audit of Neuron Selectors

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A causal audit via neuron-row zeroing shows attribution methods (LRP, IG) faithfully identify dispensable neurons and can install refusal behavior, while rank-stability proxies systematically miss selector failures.

  2. Forget the Data and Fine-Tuning! Just Fold the Network to Compress

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Model folding compresses a network by k-means clustering similar neurons across adjacent layers and repairing activation statistics without data (Fold-AR, Fold-DIR), surpassing prior data-free methods at high sparsity.

  3. Edge Intelligence in Civil Aviation: Paradigms, Techniques, and Applications

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey of edge-AI techniques and four cloud–edge–device deployment paradigms, mapped to civil aviation applications and future trends.

Pith tools