REVIEW 11 cited by
What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Instruction tuning is a standard technique employed to align large language models to end tasks and user preferences after the initial pretraining phase. Recent research indicates the critical role of data engineering in instruction tuning -- when appropriately selected, only limited data is necessary to achieve superior performance. However, we still lack a principled understanding of what makes good instruction tuning data for alignment, and how we should select data automatically and effectively. In this work, we delve deeply into automatic data selection strategies for alignment. We start with controlled studies to measure data across three dimensions: complexity, quality, and diversity, along which we examine existing methods and introduce novel techniques for enhanced data measurement. Subsequently, we propose a simple strategy to select data samples based on the measurement. We present deita (short for Data-Efficient Instruction Tuning for Alignment), a series of models fine-tuned from LLaMA and Mistral models using data samples automatically selected with our proposed approach. Empirically, deita performs better or on par with the state-of-the-art open-source alignment models with only 6K SFT training data samples -- over 10x less than the data used in the baselines. When further trained with direct preference optimization (DPO), deita-Mistral-7B + DPO trained with 6K SFT and 10K DPO samples achieve 7.55 MT-Bench and 90.06% AlpacaEval scores. We anticipate this work to provide tools on automatic data selection, facilitating data-efficient alignment. We release our models as well as the selected datasets for future researches to effectively align models more efficiently.
Forward citations
Cited by 11 Pith papers
-
Training Large Language Models for Self-Explanation Faithfulness
RL fine-tuning with a counterfactual mention/influence reward raises LLM self-explanation faithfulness (Phi-CCT) from near zero to ~0.66 in-distribution for two 8B models, with partial transfer to held-out tasks.
-
SFGA: A Statistics-First Gating Architecture with Adjudicative Escalation for Trustworthy SFT Data Procurement
A cost-aware gate that routes simple SFT procurement cases to cheap statistics and hard cases to an adjudicated LLM debate reports 0.90 accuracy on a synthetic closed-loop benchmark.
-
What makes Reasoning Models Different? Follow the Reasoning Leader for Efficient Decoding
FoReaL-Decoding lets a strong reasoning model generate the first few tokens of each sentence and a weaker model complete the sentence, cutting theoretical FLOPs by 30-55% while retaining 86-100% of accuracy on four ma...
-
SynthRL: Scaling Visual Reasoning with Verifiable Data Synthesis
SynthRL synthesizes harder, answer-preserving visual math questions from easy seed questions and reports small but mixed out-of-domain RLVR gains for Qwen2.5-VL-7B.
-
Tag-Evol: Achieving Efficient Instruction Evolving via Tag Injection
Tag-Evol generates harder, more diverse instruction data by injecting sampled knowledge tags into seed instructions, improving downstream SFT accuracy across math, code, and general benchmarks.
-
Less Data, Faster Convergence: Goal-Driven Data Optimization for Multimodal Instruction Tuning
Goal-driven selection of 1× multimodal instruction subsets reaches a 512k Uni-10x baseline after ~27–35k samples and improves accuracy by up to +3.08 pp under a fixed Qwen3-VL recipe.
-
Active Domain Knowledge Acquisition with 100-Dollar Budget: Enhancing LLMs via Cost-Efficient, Expert-Involved Interaction in Sensitive Domains
A budget-aware framework (PU-ADKA) selects which domain expert an LLM should query under a fixed $100 budget, improving specialized-domain answers at low cost.
-
MINT: Multimodal Instruction Tuning with Multimodal Interaction Grouping
Grouping instruction-tuning datasets by redundancy, uniqueness, or synergy of text-image interaction improves vision-language model accuracy over single-task and unselective multi-task tuning.
-
A Survey of LLM $\times$ DATA
A comprehensive survey of the bidirectional links between LLMs and data management, organized as DATA4LLM and LLM4DATA with a new 'IaaS' data-quality framework.
-
Data Diversification Methods In Alignment Enhance Math Performance In LLMs
DTS, which generates diverse solution strategies before writing solutions, improves GSM8K by 7.1 points and MATH by 4.2 points over an untuned base model at 1.03x baseline compute.
-
Optimising Language Models for Downstream Tasks: A Post-Training Perspective
A dissertation that repackages the author's previously published papers on continued pre-training, prompt tuning, and instruction modelling into a single narrative.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.