Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

Towards Cognitive AI Systems: a Survey and Prospective on Neuro-Symbolic AI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.01040 v1 pith:3G4YVBB3 submitted 2024-01-02 cs.AI cs.AR

classification cs.AIcs.AR
keywords nsaisystemschallengescognitivecomputationalneuralneuro-symbolicpotential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The remarkable advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), primarily driven by deep neural networks, have significantly impacted various aspects of our lives. However, the current challenges surrounding unsustainable computational trajectories, limited robustness, and a lack of explainability call for the development of next-generation AI systems. Neuro-symbolic AI (NSAI) emerges as a promising paradigm, fusing neural, symbolic, and probabilistic approaches to enhance interpretability, robustness, and trustworthiness while facilitating learning from much less data. Recent NSAI systems have demonstrated great potential in collaborative human-AI scenarios with reasoning and cognitive capabilities. In this paper, we provide a systematic review of recent progress in NSAI and analyze the performance characteristics and computational operators of NSAI models. Furthermore, we discuss the challenges and potential future directions of NSAI from both system and architectural perspectives.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evolutionary Developmental Biology Can Serve as the Conceptual Foundation for a New Design Paradigm in Artificial Intelligence

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper proposes regulatory connections, weak linkage, and component-level variation-selection, drawn from evo-devo, as the unifying conceptual foundation for a new AI design paradigm.

  2. MixGCN: Scalable GCN Training by Mixture of Parallelism and Mixture of Accelerators

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MixGCN combines feature-level and node-level parallelism with a dedicated sparse accelerator and node reordering to speed up full-graph GCN training.

  3. Symbolic Intermediaries as a Linguistic-Numerical Interface for LLM-Driven Geometric Reasoning

    cs.AI 2025-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A dual-agent LLM loop with symbolic-regression feedback improved planar mechanism synthesis Chamfer distances in most tested settings, but the headline genetic-algorithm comparison and critique-analysis claims are not...

  4. Augmenting Von Neumann's Architecture for an Intelligent Future

    cs.AR 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A speculative architecture paper that augments von Neumann computers with a Reasoning Unit co-processor to make symbolic reasoning and agent coordination hardware-native, with no implementation or evaluation.

  5. Neuro-Symbolic AI in 2024: A Systematic Review

    cs.AI 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A systematic review of 158 Neuro-Symbolic AI papers finds research concentrated in learning and inference, with explainability, trustworthiness, and Meta-Cognition as underrepresented gaps.

  6. Dspy-based Neural-Symbolic Pipeline to Enhance Spatial Reasoning in LLMs

    cs.AI 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A DSPy-orchestrated LLM plus Answer Set Programming pipeline reports 82% average accuracy on StepGame and 69% on SparQA, well above direct prompting baselines.

  7. Building Trustworthy AI: Transparent AI Systems via Large Language Models, Ontologies, and Logical Reasoning (TranspNet)

    cs.AI 2024-11 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    TranspNet is a proposed neural-symbolic pipeline that uses ontologies, RAG, and ASP to verify and explain LLM outputs, but it provides no empirical validation.

Pith tools