REVIEW 4 cited by
LLM-Powered Code Vulnerability Repair with Reinforcement Learning and Semantic Reward
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In software development, the predominant emphasis on functionality often supersedes security concerns, a trend gaining momentum with AI-driven automation tools like GitHub Copilot. These tools significantly improve developers' efficiency in functional code development. Nevertheless, it remains a notable concern that such tools are also responsible for creating insecure code, predominantly because of pre-training on publicly available repositories with vulnerable code. Moreover, developers are called the "weakest link in the chain" since they have very minimal knowledge of code security. Although existing solutions provide a reasonable solution to vulnerable code, they must adequately describe and educate the developers on code security to ensure that the security issues are not repeated. Therefore we introduce a multipurpose code vulnerability analysis system \texttt{SecRepair}, powered by a large language model, CodeGen2 assisting the developer in identifying and generating fixed code along with a complete description of the vulnerability with a code comment. Our innovative methodology uses a reinforcement learning paradigm to generate code comments augmented by a semantic reward mechanism. Inspired by how humans fix code issues, we propose an instruction-based dataset suitable for vulnerability analysis with LLMs. We further identify zero-day and N-day vulnerabilities in 6 Open Source IoT Operating Systems on GitHub. Our findings underscore that incorporating reinforcement learning coupled with semantic reward augments our model's performance, thereby fortifying its capacity to address code vulnerabilities with improved efficacy.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
From Evaluation to Optimisation: Hierarchy-Aware Training Signals for CWE Prediction in Python
Using the ALPHA hierarchy penalty as a direct GRPO reward improves CWE prediction under distribution shift, while supervised delivery of the same penalty regresses below zero-shot.
-
The Impact of Fine-tuning Large Language Models on Automated Program Repair
On three Java APR benchmarks, LoRA and IA3 adapters match or beat full-model fine-tuning for most tested code LLMs while training less than one percent of parameters.
-
Generative AI for Internet of Things Security: Challenges and Opportunities
A survey that catalogs 33 GenAI-for-IoT-security works through the MITRE ICS mitigations lens, with three small case studies on adapting LLMs to IoT incident response and security question answering.
-
Augmenting Large Language Models with Static Code Analysis for Automated Code Quality Improvements
Generating fixes with GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4o, prompted with SonarQube findings and web-retrieved examples, removed most flagged bugs, vulnerabilities, and code smells from one codebase, with success judged solely by...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.