REVIEW 2 cited by
Combining Normalizing Flows and Quasi-Monte Carlo
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent advances in machine learning have led to the development of new methods for enhancing Monte Carlo methods such as Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and importance sampling (IS). One such method is normalizing flows, which use a neural network to approximate a distribution by evaluating it pointwise. Normalizing flows have been shown to improve the performance of MCMC and IS. On the other side, (randomized) quasi-Monte Carlo methods are used to perform numerical integration. They replace the random sampling of Monte Carlo by a sequence which cover the hypercube more uniformly, resulting in better convergence rates for the error that plain Monte Carlo. In this work, we combine these two methods by using quasi-Monte Carlo to sample the initial distribution that is transported by the flow. We demonstrate through numerical experiments that this combination can lead to an estimator with significantly lower variance than if the flow was sampled with a classic Monte Carlo.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Transport Quasi-Monte Carlo
A transport-map estimator built from composed autoregressive layers and randomized quasi-Monte Carlo points achieves O(n^{-1+ε}) error for general target distributions under stated growth conditions.
-
Error estimation for quasi-Monte Carlo
A review of uncertainty quantification for quasi-Monte Carlo that recommends Student's t intervals from at least 10 randomized replicates and identifies near-symmetry of RQMC errors as a promising but unproven basis f...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.