Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

"The teachers are confused as well": A Multiple-Stakeholder Ethics Discussion on Large Language Models in Computing Education

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.12453 v1 pith:RIOF3KPL submitted 2024-01-23 cs.CY cs.HC

classification cs.CYcs.HC
keywords educationllmsethicalhighermodelsstudentsconcernsissues
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are advancing quickly and impacting people's lives for better or worse. In higher education, concerns have emerged such as students' misuse of LLMs and degraded education outcomes. To unpack the ethical concerns of LLMs for higher education, we conducted a case study consisting of stakeholder interviews (n=20) in higher education computer science. We found that students use several distinct mental models to interact with LLMs - LLMs serve as a tool for (a) writing, (b) coding, and (c) information retrieval, which differ somewhat in ethical considerations. Students and teachers brought up ethical issues that directly impact them, such as inaccurate LLM responses, hallucinations, biases, privacy leakage, and academic integrity issues. Participants emphasized the necessity of guidance and rules for the use of LLMs in higher education, including teaching digital literacy, rethinking education, and having cautious and contextual policies. We reflect on the ethical challenges and propose solutions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bias, Accuracy, and Trust: Gender-Diverse Perspectives on Large Language Models

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Gender-diverse users perceive ChatGPT's gender bias differently, with non-binary/transgender participants reporting condescending and stereotypical responses, and men reporting higher trust.

Pith tools