REVIEW 14 cited by
AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agents
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) as general-purpose agents is essential for understanding their capabilities and facilitating their integration into practical applications. However, the evaluation process presents substantial challenges. A primary obstacle is the benchmarking of agent performance across diverse scenarios within a unified framework, especially in maintaining partially-observable environments and ensuring multi-round interactions. Moreover, current evaluation frameworks mostly focus on the final success rate, revealing few insights during the process and failing to provide a deep understanding of the model abilities. To address these challenges, we introduce AgentBoard, a pioneering comprehensive benchmark and accompanied open-source evaluation framework tailored to analytical evaluation of LLM agents. AgentBoard offers a fine-grained progress rate metric that captures incremental advancements as well as a comprehensive evaluation toolkit that features easy assessment of agents for multi-faceted analysis. This not only sheds light on the capabilities and limitations of LLM agents but also propels the interpretability of their performance to the forefront. Ultimately, AgentBoard serves as a step towards demystifying agent behaviors and accelerating the development of stronger LLM agents.
Forward citations
Cited by 14 Pith papers
-
Argus: A General-Purpose Agentic Runtime for Long-Horizon Reasoning
Argus demonstrates that a fixed-weight, self-evolving multi-role agentic runtime with verification-gated persistence can achieve competitive benchmark results and retain reusable state across long-horizon tasks.
-
Beyond Component Testing: Validating Agentic AI Systems
Agentic AI cannot be adequately validated by component tests alone; trajectory-in-context validation is required, and current practice is mature only for behavioral evaluation.
-
WorkSurface-Bench: Benchmarking Enterprise Agents on Multi-Surface Knowledge Routing
WorkSurface-Bench measures surface routing separately from answer correctness and finds near-perfect routing still leaves 25–44% answer errors across four LLM backbones.
-
SQBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Task Delivery by Language-Model Agents in Production-Oriented Workflows
SQBench, a 220-task benchmark, separates functional task completion from delivery risk and reports that all 27 tested AI configurations pass strict delivery on under 61% of weighted tasks.
-
Do AI-Native Biotechs Need Departments? Benchmarking Company World Models for AI-Driven Drug Development
A shared asset-to-value AI-agent architecture beats department-mimicking agents on a BD/approval/revenue rubric, but not under neutral judging, so the advantage is objective-sensitive.
-
Galaxy: A Cognition-Centered Framework for Proactive, Privacy-Preserving, and Self-Evolving LLM Agents
Galaxy couples a cognitive tree structure with a meta-agent to make LLM assistants proactive, privacy-preserving, and self-evolving.
-
MCPEval: Automatic MCP-based Deep Evaluation for AI Agent Models
MCPEval is an automated MCP-based framework that generates, verifies, and scores LLM agent tool-use tasks; its experiments reveal a consistent gap between how well agents execute tool calls and how well they synthesiz...
-
DrafterBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Tasks Automation in Civil Engineering
DrafterBench is a new benchmark of 1,920 PDF drawing-revision tasks; on it, the best model (OpenAI o1) averages about 80/100, and all tested models fail hard on incomplete instructions and plan execution.
-
G-Memory: Tracing Hierarchical Memory for Multi-Agent Systems
G-Memory stores past multi-agent teamwork in a three-tier graph and retrieves it to boost performance on five benchmarks.
-
LAM SIMULATOR: Advancing Data Generation for Large Action Model Training via Online Exploration and Trajectory Feedback
Self-generated agent trajectories from LAM SIMULATOR improved fine-tuned model pass rates by up to 49.3% on ToolBench and CRMArena.
-
A Survey of Automatic Evaluation Methods on Text, Visual and Speech Generations
A unified taxonomy and comparative meta-evaluation of automatic evaluation methods across text, vision, and speech generation, concluding that LLM-based evaluators dominate current practice.
-
Make Planning Research Rigorous Again!
A position paper calling for LLM-based planning research to reuse the rigor, benchmarks, and tools of the classical automated planning community.
-
Focus Is All You Need: Adaptive Goal-aware Attention Orchestration for Multi-Agent Graph Systems
AGAO dynamically prioritizes agents in multi-agent graphs using goal, topology, and resource attention, improving coding pass rates while cutting active nodes and agent time on small pilot tasks.
-
Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Survey
A review that proposes a two-dimensional taxonomy for evaluating LLM agents and highlights enterprise-specific evaluation gaps.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.